The WSJ Doesn’t Understand the Difference Between ‘Why’ and ‘What’

 As appeared on my Times of Israel blog.

 

The Wall Street Journal ran a lengthy article entitled “Why Arab States Hate Trump’s Plan to Relocate Palestinians” (Feb 1. 2025). It opens with an absolute correct observation: “The Arab world is pushing back, ostensibly because it would undermine efforts to create a Palestinian state. But Arab leaders have another reason to oppose providing safe haven to millions of Gazans forced from their homes: past experience. Palestinian refugees have been a headache for Arab governments since the creation of the state of Israel in 1948.”

Even though the headline asks “Why”, the writers answered “What” to do with the Palestinian refugee problem? Yes, the question should be “Why is there a Palestinian refugee problem?” After all, from the tens of millions of refugees from World War II, there are none remaining. In addition, there are no Jewish refugees after the shocking expulsion of 850,000 Jews from Arab lands in the early 1950’s, where Jews had lived for over one thousand years.

The answer to the Palestinian Refugee problem can be found in the different objectives of the UN Refugee Agency and UNRWA. The former is focused on caring for and settling refugees to become productive citizens of the countries where they and their descendants take refuge. However, the latter’s objective is to use the unique generational refugee status (where 3rd and 4th generations later are still considered refuges) as a tactic to achieve the Islamic Jihadist goal of world religious domination and rule. Arab nations say they care about the “Palestinian” refugees, but action speaks louder than words, and they let them squaller in camps in their countries rather than offering them citizenship, like other refugees throughout history and the world.

Proof of UNRWA’s complicity in this violent objective can be found at UNwatch.org. It is surprising that the editors allowed the writers to almost exclusively use UNRWA, a proven haven for Hamas and holding pen for the inhumanely treated hostages, as their data source for the article.

Furthermore, the subhead of the article reads: “A history of violent conflict is among the reasons that regional neighbors are opposed to providing a haven for war-weary Gazans.” Again, the answer to the missing “Why” is the violent history of Arab and terrorist invasions. Not the peaceful and repeated outreaches of the modern State of Israel (see the Israel Declaration of Independence, repeated two-state solution offers, and more.) Therefore, Hamas (and Iran) is also the “Why” there is so much devastation in Gaza, not Israel.

The foundation of good Journalism is to answer objectively: Who, What, When, Where, Why, and How. Period.

# # #

About: David S. Levine, MBA, is the author of the recently released “Revolutions: In Their Own Words, What That Really Says About Their Causes”.

 



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Getting Beyond the Conflict. Its them. Not us.

Mitchell Bard’s recent article ( War-gaming ‘hasbara’ December 8 JNS) puts forth a very interesting concept: Treat government Hasbara (public diplomacy) as one more weapon in the military arsenal. Therefore, make the messaging part of the military’s planning and execution to be prepared before (similar to air force bombardment softening the ground for a ground invasion) and during the events. However, Israel seems to always be in the middle of some event. His idea is very interesting, needed, and should be explored. It adds to Melanie Phillips’ insightful article “ Why Israel needs a strategy to shape the narrative ” (JNS November 26, 2021) where she correctly proclaims “it is absolutely astounding that Israel still has no centralized communications strategy. Instead, different agencies feud with each other to put out largely uncoordinated responses to the propaganda onslaught that has hijacked language and all but rewritten the Jews out of their own historic story.” Unfortunat...
Read more

Yishuv ≠ Settlement. Israelis ≠ Settlers.

Appeared in the Jerusalem Post , August 15, 2023 under the headline: There is no such thing as an Israeli ‘settler’ in the West Bank   According to the Cambridge dictionary a settler is a person who arrives, especially from another country, to a new place in order to live there and use the land. A settlement, according to vocabulary.com, is a colony or any small community of people . However, these definitions take on negative connotations when it pertains to Israel and Israelis. Even Israeli media has headlines such as “Settlers arrested after deadly clash in Palestinian village.” Various Biblical texts refer to Israel as a “land flowing with milk and honey.” This description is in stark contrast to Mark Twain’s observations in 1867 that Israel (then called Palestine) was a desolate and barren country in both people and vegetation. It was only after the start of the aliyah movement in the late 1800’s, when many Jew...
Read more

Did Pharaoh Know the Way to Palestine?

As appeared on my Times of Israel Blog  The new Netflix block buster “Testament: The Story of Moses,” is a docudrama retelling the Exodus with commentary from religious leaders across a variety of Jewish, Christian, and Muslim denominations. The limited series mixes dramatized scenes and traditional footage of experts and, historical evidence. While the dramatizations sometimes take liberties in comparison to the actual Biblical text, it is an attempt to be both entertaining and true to the overall story. A few reviews have cited “mediocre” visual effects, biblical inaccuracies, and claims of empty attempts to anachronistically interpret Moses’s story as one of social justice. One of the comments that jumped out at me was one of historical inaccuracy that carried with it a potentially politically charged hidden message. Dr. Monica Hana Assoc Prof, College of Archaeology and Cultural Heritage,  states [at time stamp 27:19 in Episode 1]  “…he [Ramses II] leads several cam...
Read more