Solving the Palestinian Problem Requires the Truth Not Misinformation.

 As appeared in my ToI blog and slightly edited on JNS.org

 

Two recent articles in the Wall Street Journal need to be discussed. First is Mr. Elliot Kaufman’s July 5, 2025 “A New Palestinian Offer for Peace With Israel” discussing how Hebron’s Sheikhs propose to leave the Palestinian Authority and join the Abraham Accords. The second is Mr. Mahmoud Jabari’s July 9, 2025 response “A Hebron ‘Emirate’ or a Colonial Deception?” where the author posits that the Hebron proposal plays into Israel’s plan to divide and conquer the Palestinians of the West Bank.

In Mr. Kaufman’s article, the Sheiks write that they will recognize “the State of Israel as the nation state of the Jewish people.” He goes on to point out that the “Sheikhs accepting Israel as a Jewish state goes further than the Palestinian Authority ever has and sweeps aside decades of rejectionism.”

Mr. Kaufman, however, does not explore if they will change their anti-Israel/Jewish and Western education programs and whether religious prayers will now reflect this fundamental Islamic change of not seeking complete political and religious dominance.

The title of Mr. Jabari’s opinion piece already sets up its anti-Israel tone and biased slant. Here are some fact-check points the WSJ failed to uncover.

 

·       Mr. Jabari points out he left Hebron as a young child because the “violence of the second intifada and the relentless aggression of Israeli settlers made staying impossible.” Yet, he fails to point out that the intifada is an Islamic call to kill (genocide) and the “aggression” of Israelis is his misinformative explanation of the fact that Israeli government has control over Hebron based on the Oslo Accords.

·       His claim that the Sheik’s proposal is “peace through fragmentation, replacing Palestinian national aspirations… This isn’t new thinking — it’s the colonial playbook.” Again, he is referring to Israel as a colonial power rather than the rightful democratic government it is.

·       While he is correct that the Palestine Liberation Organization recognized Israel’s right to exist in 1993, the rhetoric and actions of the Palestinian leaders and followers tell a different story. The two intifadas (violence against Jews) (1st: 1987-1993 and 2nd: 2000-2005), included many various violent and deadly terrorist attacks in many central Israel cities (Jerusalem, Tel Aviv, Herzliya, to name a few). A tacit encouragement of violence against Jews has continued, as can be seen by the horror of two Palestinian Authority policemen murdering a 22-year-old Jewish man at a shopping center very recently (July 10, 2025).  This is reenforced by the July 13, 2025 WSJ editorial “Report shows how PA Security Forces lionize officers who kill Israelis.” Actions speak louder than words.

·       He claims that [Netanyahu’s] “government allowed the provision of money to Hamas after its rise to power in Gaza to weaken the Palestinian Authority.” But he doesn’t mention that the money came from Qatar to be distributed to the general population and that after Hamas was elected by the Gazans in 2006 there was deadly and violent routing of PA and Fatah in 2007.

·       Mr. Jabari states “The settler population nearly doubled during the Oslo years.” He goes on to claim “that there are places where the Palestinian Authority is absent not because residents reject it, but because Israel restrains it. The Jabari neighborhood is located in Area C, the 60% of the West Bank where Israel prohibits PA security forces from operating and maintains full military (and police) control.” What he neglects to point out is that the Oslo Peace Accords set up Areas A, B, and C. By definition and agreement with the Palestinian leadership, Area C (including Hebron) is where Israel maintains full control and Area A is where the PA administers control. There is no “sleight of hand” to fragment Palestinian society, as he contends.

·       He complains that Sheik’s commitment to “zero tolerance” for terrorism by Palestinian workers implies that Palestinian society somehow tolerates violence. And that “[M]ost Palestinians, including those who oppose the occupation most strongly, seek freedom through peaceful means.” Yet surveys by Palestinian pollsters show an overwhelming Palestinian support of the terrorist organization Hamas and its violent methods.

·       He claims that “Palestinians aren’t asking for Israeli approval of our representatives. We’re asking for the right to choose them ourselves, to shape our own future, to live as a free people in our own land.” Choose your own leaders? Then why is Mahmud Abbas celebrating his 20th year as president of the PA after being elected to a 4-year term? Live in your own land? While the origin of “Palestine” and its people is another discussion, the question remains why have Palestinian and/or Arab leadership turned down numerous offers for the “two-state” solution starting with United Resolution 181 in November 1947?

·       According to the author, “real peace” should have the victim (Israel) end the war in Gaza rather than the inhumane, Iran-backed Hamas attackers, who have never agreed to returning all hostages. Then, he continues, Israel should negotiate with the PA and PLO for a “credible and irreversible” path to a two-state solution based on the June 6, 1967, borders. Even though, (a) the recent history of negotiations by the PA, PLO, Hamas, Hezbollah, and even Iran, have been based on taqiyya, an Islamic concept that allows lying to confound and defeat enemies through deception; (b) it would violate the 1994 Jordan-Israel Peace Treaty that officially gave the West Bank (Judea and Samaria) to Israel after defeating the invading Jordanians (along with the Syrians and Egyptians) in the Six Day War of June 1967; (c) the Oslo Peace Accords already gave the PA territory to demonstrate its ability to govern.

·       In addition, Mr. Jabari includes two more standards in his description of “real peace.” (1) The resolution of the Palestinian refugee issue. Yet one has to ask why, when compared to any other displaced people, and even the UN’s own refugee agency, only Palestinians have UN-sanctioned multi-generational funded refugee status? and (2) a “Marshall Plan-style investment program that builds the Palestinian economy from the ground up, including in Gaza.” This is a good idea but what happened to the more than $40 billion already given by the US, UNRWA and other countries to the PA since 1994 to build their economy and infrastructure? Instead it was spent on “pay to slay” salaries of terrorists, funding rockets, and building of massive terror tunnels.

 

However, the most egregious statement by Mr. Jabari, allowed to be printed by the WSJ, is “But when you deny people legitimate political channels for their aspirations, when you close every door to dignity and self-determination, you can’t be surprised when some choose desperate measures.”

Mr. Jabari is therefore supporting, endorsing, defending, and rationalizing the inhumane and barbaric violence of October 7, 2023, when Hamas (and followers) brutally murdered, burned babies, raped, and kidnapped civilians. And they gleefully filmed themselves doing it. These barbaric actions are against every international law. 

And if Mr. Jabari believes “doors to dignity and self-determination” are closed, maybe he can explain why Palestinians have rejected repeated two-state solutions, while Hamas and Hezbollah have signed many cease fires, only to start attacking Israeli civilians time and again. If any doors have been closed, the Palestinians have done it to themselves.

Mr. Jabari’s bio line to the article merely states that he “is a Geneva-based international-affairs analyst.” While he is that, it should be noted that he has done very well for himself educationally and careerwise. He currently serves as the Global Engagement Lead at the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Geneva, Switzerland. This is the prestigious organization that runs the famous annual Davos Meeting. Yet he still considers himself a “refugee.”

Finally, it is most disturbing and upsetting that the reputable Wall Street Journal would give Mr. Jabari a platform to foment these lies and misinformation. Solving the Palestinian problem requires facing the truth not misinformation. They should know that. The WSJ is not Tucker Carlson.

 

# # #

David S. Levine, MBA. Author of “Revolutions: In Their Own Words – What They Really Say About Their Causes” and the forthcoming book “Prayer: In Their Own Words –  Islam-Catholicism-Judaism – What Do They Pray For?” David is a former New York City advertising & marketing executive, and a retired university instructor at Rutgers University. Follow him on X (Twitter): @DavidsLevine

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

This Liberation Movement’s Only Tactic is to Destroy.

   [As appeared in the Jerusalem Post (edited for space), unedited article below.] “The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel…Palestinian identity would be emphasized for political reasons.” – Palestine Liberation Organization senior executive committee member. Objective or Tactic? A tactic, by definition, is a method used in the process of achieving an objective or goal. In this instance, creating the concept of a Palestinian peoplehood or state is a tactic that has been employed consistently, and I am afraid to say, brilliantly, for the sole purpose of destroying the modern Jewish State of Israel. The benefit or well-being of anyone identified as Palestinian is clearly not the objective or goal. The unfortunate success of this abhorrent tactic is evidenced by the continued deplorable condition of Palestinian refugees in neighboring Arab countries. And the “Palestinian’s” inhumane employment of te...
Read more

Palestine By Any Other Name Is Still Israel

What’s in a name? An often-asked question whose answer is complicated. Why does the media call them Arab towns but Israeli settlements ? Why did Greece protest when a new country, located to their north, named itself Macedonia, and then forced by the outcry to rename itself North Macedonia? Why does my mother insist I am David and not Dave? The simple answer: Words have meaning. There is history and nuance behind words and names. So here is a little light history. The ancient dates below are approximate. Timeline through history. When Abraham, the first monotheist and Jew, answered G-d’s call it was the beginning of Judaism; 2075 BCE. After 410 years of slavery in Egypt, traveling through the desert for 40 years and receiving the 10 Commandments, the Jewish people (aka The Children of Israel), settled in the Promised Land (Israel) around 1250 BCE and established their kingdoms. When Constantine proclaimed the Edict of Milan in 313 CE, considered by many to be the beginn...
Read more

For Israel to Grow Up, it Needs Political and Electoral Reform Now

 As appeared in the Jerusalem Post and Times of Israel Blogs .   Israel has grown into a world power in a comparably short period of time despite constantly fighting for its survival against much larger odds on the geo-political stage or in actual warfare.   The “nation building” was important (and successful) but it was rushed with just enough for what was necessary. Most Western European and North American countries had either the luxury, time, money, peace, and/or focus, to build well thought out and scalable political infrastructures. Israel now needs to take that time and thoughtful approach.   The Knesset must put forth changes to maintain a national coalition that can last an elected term, as well as deal with the national divisiveness over “judicial reform” that ended abruptly on 7 October 2023. Both issues are poised to return once a new election date is declared, or the coalition unity is threatened.   Let’s simplify a complicated topic ...
Read more